Someone needs to explain to me why I would get the alert some 500 miles away when those 100 miles away did not. Oh wait, the answer is because there is a state border in close proximity to the East, but not the North. Of course, silly me, a kidnapper makes sure to stay in the original state of abductin. Not! In search and rescue when looking at a map, you make radiating rings from the last known location based on time that has passed and how far your missing person potentially could have traveled. Why on earth would you not do the same thing for an Amber Alert? I understand that you can't set one off across the entire 50 states, but it seems to me for the first at least 3-5 days they should be able to broadcast them in all directions based on that same type of calculation.
In Hannah's case, the alert only went North (and to the Border to Mexico), because they felt he was likely headed to Canada. Meanwhile, they were cruising through Nevada and then into Idaho without anyone having a clue they should be on the lookout for this car and this child. Then when they finally do get the alert out to Idaho they put it up on the news and there is no phone number! Luckily the good citizen(s) who spotted them in the Idaho wilderness had the fortitude to call an old friend at the Idaho State Police which got the ball rolling. Really though? No phone number? Come on people.
Again, Hannah got lucky. These people that are nothing short of angels who were there at the right time and the right place lead to her rescue, but it certainly was not a great deal of help from the Amber Alert system. These are not ridiculously complicated changes that need to be made. This is basic stuff. Geographic proximity and boundaries instead of state lines and put a phone number up. That can't be too much to ask.